God’s
will to heal is not constant. On our recent mission trip (2003)
to Pakistan, Dubai, and India, we saw a wide spectrum of this factor.
At times,
the Lord would say “no.” This was His answer to the
mighty man of faith the apostle Paul when asked to remove the thorn
from his flesh (the original Greek allows the thorn to be a physical
infirmity). Despite Paul’s great faith to move mountains,
no healing took place. At the other end of the spectrum---in different
circumstances---His sovereign will to heal would be so strong that
little effort on our part was needed. In between the two extremes,
where God's will to heal may in fact be "neutral" and
the results are instead "according to our faith," exercising
our authority over disease by commanding healing in the name of
Jesus may be required.
There
is another factor which can influence physical healing in the name
of Jesus. Different infirmities require different measures of authority
to minister the healing. Light infirmities such as ordinary headaches
are relatively simple to dispatch in the name of Jesus. In contrast,
to minister healing to someone lame or blind from birth under ordinary
circumstances will require a measure of authority beyond what most
believers have been given by the Lord. Extraordinary circumstances
where these miracles are more likely to take place are found in
mass evangelistic meetings where the gospel is proclaimed very
boldly.
These
two factors---God’s will to heal and the specific measure
of authority given to the believer---can vary independently in
each situation. In light of our recent mission trip, let’s
examine the role of the first of these two factors in miraculous
healing: God's will to heal.
Quetta
is a town close to the border that Third-World Pakistan shares
with Afghanistan. In evangelistic meetings there an elderly woman
blind in one eye and a young boy blind in one eye since birth were
healed as believers laid hands on them. Of particular interest
was the case of the boy whose eye was quickly opened when a young
man only one year in Christ ministered to him. God's will to heal
in Pakistan during the proclamation of the gospel was found to
be strong.
In India,
many healings took place in the evangelistic Crusade meetings.
In New Delhi, a blind man saw as a local pastor laid hands on him.
Hindus were healed of various infirmities through trained believers
and came to Christ. There were so many testimonies of healing that
we had difficulty hearing all of them. In Orissa, the poorest state
in all India, a little boy lame in one leg began to walk on that
leg after Houston Pastor John Thomas ministered to him. A deaf-mute
teenage boy could hear and speak after the ministry of mass healing,
in which no one laid hands on him. It was very evident that God's
will to heal in India as the gospel was being presented was strong.
Standing
in contrast to the meetings in Pakistan and India, both considered
poor countries, were those conducted in Dubai, a wealthy state
of the oil-rich United Arab Emirates. The design and architecture
of some of the buildings in modern Dubai equal if not surpass anything
seen in the West. Dubai even boasts of a seven-star hotel, reputedly
the only such hotel of its kind in the world. This year its national
airline enjoyed record profits as most other airlines in the world
went through catastrophic decline. Interestingly, the miracles
witnessed in the Dubai meetings were fewer and less powerful than
those in the poorer countries. A young deaf-mute girl, the child
of a devoted Christian doctor, experienced no improvement in her
hearing despite repeated ministry by different believers, including
myself. But the wonderful believers in the Dubai meetings (many
of them originally from India) ministered with authority and mountain-moving
faith equal to that of the believers in Pakistan and India. What
might explain the difference in the miracles between Dubai on the
one hand, and India and Pakistan on the other?
In terms
of spiritual darkness, all three are comparable. India counts three-quarters
of a billion Hindus worshipping countless false gods. Pakistan
has been known as a haven for Isl--mic terrorists and discriminates
heavily against Christians. Dubai is an Isl--mic state where evangelism
is forbidden except inside a few designated church complexes, and
even there to non-Arabs only.
Economically,
however, Dubai is relatively wealthy while India and Pakistan are
poor. This may go far in explaining the difference in the miracles.
Other things being equal, God wills to heal more powerfully in
poorer countries than He does in richer countries. “Where
darkness abounds, the grace of God abounds all the more.” To
the poor the Lord may give greater grace in the realm of miraculous
healing than to those who have far more access to quality medical
care. There may possibly be an additional factor as well. "Listen,
my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the
eyes of the world to be rich in faith [for healing (my addition)]...?" James
2:5
The
End Time Model of Evangelism
Other teachings